123student.com


  Categories
 American History
 Arts & Music
 Biographies
 Black History
 Creative Writing
 Economics
 English
 Environment
 Film
 Geography
 History
 Law
 Literature
 Miscellaneous
 Politics
 Religion
 Science & Technology
 Shakespeare
 Social Issues
 Sports
 World History

Free Essays > Politics > Greg Sirico

Greg Sirico

Below is free essays on Greg Sirico by 123Student, your one-stop source for free essays, free college term papers, and free term papers. Look for more free essays and free term papers using the search box above.

Word Count: 444
Page Count: 2

Greg Sirico

Greg Sirico                                             

Adv American Gov.

November 14th ’98

               McCulloch v Maryland



     Can congress incorporate a bank? Can a state tax the national government? These were some of the key issues that brought up in the Supreme Court case of McCullloch v Maryland. James Madison, the judge in this case, rules in favor of the National Government. He proclaimed that it was constitutional to have a national bank, and not appropriate for Maryland to tax the bank.



     Now we turn the tables toward Maryland. In my reasoning I believe that Maryland can uphold their right to tax the national bank, as well as make claims of the “necessary and proper clause” being incorrect in it’s meaning. Maryland in my opinion holds very good references and ideas which lead me to believe that the national bank should never have been created, and if so created be able to have been taxed. Both points coming from the Constitution.



     Maryland as well as every other state in the union, has the power to tax. It is a concurrent power, which enables them (Maryland) to obtain the power to tax. The power to tax is the power to create. Since the national bank itself is in Baltimore, I believe the state, in which it is holds ground, which is Maryland, has some type of property tax upon the national bank.  In this point we can see how the state government has some kind of right to tax the national bank.



Moving forward, we come across the Necessary and Proper Clause (Elastic Clause). It is stated in the Constitution that the government is empowered to imply this clause to issues at hand. The controversy issue is the appropriate definition for this word, necessary. However, necessary in Maryland’s point of view means “indispensable” and Madison defines it as “convenient”. Now in this point, it is unjust to provide the national government with such power as this. If it is in fact convenient for the national government, is it convenient for us the people? The answer is no, this gives leverage to Maryland’s argument that necessary should in-fact mean as is.



As we can see through my, and the state of Maryland’s view, the national bank should have never been created, and even if such an idea would have been about, it is still reprehensible for taxation. Maryland in my belief was correct in it’s arguments, and points. Now as I conclude, I have shown you my reasons why, and have brought me to my final decision that there really is no equality between the state government and the national government. In seeing this, it is appropriate to believe that the congresses can in-fact do as they PLEASE.

© 2006 123Student. All Rights Reserved. 123Student is your one-stop source for free essays, free college term papers, and free term papers. Part of the Free Essay Network.

Related Keywords: national, Maryland, bank, tax, government, state, power, believe, necessary, created, point, Maryland’s, appropriate, fact, convenient, free essays, free term papers, free college term papers

Back to Top




Sponsored by:
Digital Term Papers
Mid Term Papers
Student Papers
Term Papers
Free Essays
Moopuna Term Papers

Free Essays
This entire site protected by copyright. Copyright © 1998-2006 123Student, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Part of the Free Essay Network.