123student.com


  Categories
 American History
 Arts & Music
 Biographies
 Black History
 Creative Writing
 Economics
 English
 Environment
 Film
 Geography
 History
 Law
 Literature
 Miscellaneous
 Politics
 Religion
 Science & Technology
 Shakespeare
 Social Issues
 Sports
 World History

Free Essays > Economics > Inflation

Inflation

Below is free essays on Inflation by 123Student, your one-stop source for free essays, free college term papers, and free term papers. Look for more free essays and free term papers using the search box above.

Word Count: 1615
Page Count: 7

Inflation






Inflation



     Over the last century many countries throughout the world have experienced

inflation as their major economic problem. Expensive wars have traditionally been

recognized as the sources of inflation. Governments, in effort to squeeze more production

out of an economy, have often resorted to printing or releasing more money to finance the

purchase of arms and soldiers1. In an economy already producing at full capacity, the

issuing of additional money serves to bid up the prices of the output of the economy,

resulting in inflation. It was generally assumed from past experience, that once the

economy returned to its normal state, the persistent tendency for overall prices to rise

would disappear, bringing inflation rates back to normal. World War II brought the

persistent inflation that economists came to expect. In the 50's and early 60's inflation

resumed to very low rates concomitant with large growth increases and low

unemployment. But, from 1967 to 1974 the rates of inflation reached alarming proportions

in many countries, such as Japan and Britain, for no apparent reason. This acceleration in

inflation has forced many economists to reevaluate their views, and often align themselves

with a specific school of thought regarding the causes and cures for inflation.

     There are two opposite theories regarding inflation. Monetarism indicates that

inflation is due to increases in the supply of money. The classic example of this

relationship is the inflation that followed an inflow of gold and silver into Europe, resulting

from the Spanish conquest of the Americas. According to monetarists, the only way to

cure inflation is by government action to reduce growth of the money supply.      

     At the other end is the cost-push theory. Cost-pushers believe that the source of

inflation is the rate of wage increases. They believe that wage increases are independent of

all economic factors, and generally are determined by workers and trade unions. More

specifically, inflation occurs when the wages demanded by trade unions and workers add

up to more than the economy is capable of producing. Cost- pushers advocate limiting the

power of trade unions and using income policies to help fight off inflation.

     In between the cost-push and monetarism theory is Keynesianism. Keynesians

recognize the importance of both the money supply and wage rates in determining

inflation. They sometimes advise using monetary and incomes policies as complimentary

measures to reduce inflation, but most often rely on fiscal policy as the cure.



     Before we can understand the policies suggested by these different schools of

thought, we must look at the historical development of our understanding of inflation.  

     For approximately 200 years before John Maynard Keynes wrote the General

Theory of Employment, Interest , and Money, there was a broad agreement among

economists as to the sources of inflationary pressure, known as the quantity theory of

money2. The Quantity theory of money is easily understood through fisher's equation



     MV=PY    ( money supply times velocity of circulation of money equals price

               times real income)

     Quantity theorists believe that over an extended period of time the size of M, the

money supply, cannot affect the overall economic output, Y. They also assume that for all

practical purposes V was constant because short term variations in the circulations of

money are  short lived, and long term changes in the velocity of circulation are so small as

to be inconsequential . Lastly, this theory rests on the belief that the supply of money is in

no way determined by the economic output or the demand for money itself.  

     The central prediction that can now be made is that changes in the money supply

will lead to equiproportionate changes in prices. If the money supply goes up then

individuals initially find themselves with more money. Normally individuals will tend to

spend most of their excess money. The attempt of people to buy more than they normally

do must result in the bidding up of prices because of the competitive nature of the market,

inflation.

     Also essential to the quantity theory is the belief that in a competitive market,

where wages and prices are free to fluctuate,  there would be an automatic tendency for

the market to correct itself  and full employment to be established.

     In figure 1, w stands for the real wage rate (the amount of goods and services that

an individuals money income can buy), L d for the demand for labor and L s for the supply

for labor. Suppose now that the economic system inherited a real wage rate w 1, The

supply of labor is L s1 while the demand for labor is only L d1.



















At this point there is substantial unemployment because labor is costly for employers to

buy. According to Classicalists, The existence of an excess supply of labor will lead to a

competitive struggle between the unemployed and employed for the available jobs. This

struggle will lead to a reduction of real wages, thus employers will begin hiring more

workers. Eventually competition will drive down wages to an equilibrium called labor-

market clearance, where the demand and supply for labor is equal; this is We Le.

Classicalists define Labor market clearance as the point of full employment. Thus,

persistent unemployment can only be explained by a mechani..



...sm which interferes with a

competitive market. They specifically blame monopolistic trade unions for preventing the

wage rate from falling to We.  Unions may use many threatening tactics to fight wage

cuts. Those most effective  mentioned in the textbooks are collective bargaining and

strikes.

     

     The Great depression, as experienced by the US and the countries of western

Europe, cast a shadow over the Classical approach to economics3. The self-righting

properties of classical economics were clearly not working when wages and

unemployment failed to decrease. Blaming trade unions for these massive increases in

unemployment seemed far fetched.

     John Maynard Keynes was the first writer to produce a non-classical, coherent,

and convincing explanation of the inter-war depression. He traced the sources of

unemployment to a deficiency of effective demand. Put simply, unemployment occurred

when total spending on output was not enough to fully employ the available workforce.

Effective demand, called expenditures, was split into two groups by Keynes, consumption

and investment. Consumption, the purchase of goods and services,  far outweighed

investment as the major component of effective demand.  

     At the theories'' core lay Keynes'  belief that an economies'' total production, Y,

will eventually adapt itself to changes expenditures. Moreover Keynes argued that the

equilibrium of wages exist when the output of producers is equal to the amount that

consumers and investors are willing to spend on their output.

     Consider figure 2 Total expenditure, that is the sum of consumption and

investment , is measured on the vertical and real income on the horizontal. For practical

purposes investment will remain a constant in the graph and be represented by line I. If we

add the consumption function and the investment line, we get the the sum total

expenditures, line E (E = C+I).

     

















     For any given amount of expenditures, Y can be located anywhere for a short time.

If Y is above E, then producers are simply accumulating unsold stocks of goods.

Eventually they will be forced to cut back on production until they can sell their existing

stocks, earning capital enough capital to restart production. Conversely, If Y is below E,

producers will be selling out of goods. Normally they will increase production as soon as

possible to catch up to the demand and make the most profit. This is where, the 45 line

comes into use. Y, according to Keynes, will shift to the  point where E intersects the 45

line. When Y intersects E at the 45 line, there is an equilibrium between expenditures and

total output, and wages are stable.

      In order to illustrate how Keynes' principle of effective demand accounts for

unemployment, let us assume that the economy starts off at full employment where Ld

(demand for labor) equals Ls (supply). The label of the output necessary to sustain full

employment is Yf, f denoting full employment. If expenditures were smaller than Yf, than

Yf would adjust itself to the left on the graph to accommodate for this. Because the level

of total output has shrunk, the demand for labor also has, and unemployment has risen

correspondingly .

     If one accepts the Keynesian model, there are generally two things that can be

done to raise the level of aggregate demand to a point where Y adjusts to full

employment. Raising government expenditures, G, stimulating private investment, or

lowering taxes, raising consumption because people will have more money to spend, will

both raise the level of aggregate demand. Both these policies come under the heading of

fiscal policy, which is deliberate manipulation of the government budget deficit in order to

achieve an economic objective.

     During the great depression, many people rejected Keynes' ideas on unemployment

because they were scared to be different. The contemporary orthodox view was that cuts

in the money wages would automatically be accompanied by cuts in the real wages, thus

raising employment. Classicalists prescribed the government a remedy for unemployment

based on implementing money wage reductions. Keynes rejected this idea on both

theoretical and empirical grounds.

     After the first World War, collective bargaining rendered the downward flexibility

of wages highly improbable. Any attempts at cutting money wages would be fiercely

resisted, as seen as the 1926 General Strike in Britain painfully demonstrated. Keynes

regarded the trade unions' resistance to wage cuts as a product of the rigid structure of

wage differentials. This is actually just the relative position of the wages of a particular

type of labor to all others,  F.E. mechanics get paid 1$,Electricians get 2$, plumbers get

3$. If any one group received generally higher wages, other groups would surely demand

higher wages to preserve the structure. On the other hand, if a single group wantonly

decided to accept a wage cut, other groups would likely not follow. Therefore labor

groups vehemently resisted wage cuts.

     Theoretically, Keynes believed that drops in the money wages would eventually be

accompanied by a drops in prices. This balanced deflation would bring real wages, the

amount of goods that could be bought, to their original amount. Employers would not

take on more workers because their real revenue, amount of goods they sell, would remain

unchanged.

© 2006 123Student. All Rights Reserved. 123Student is your one-stop source for free essays, free college term papers, and free term papers. Part of the Free Essay Network.

Related Keywords: money, inflation, wages, demand, supply, wage, labor, Keynes, unemployment, output, real, employment, expenditures, full, goods, free essays, free term papers, free college term papers

Back to Top




Sponsored by:
Digital Term Papers
Mid Term Papers
Student Papers
Term Papers
Free Essays
Moopuna Term Papers

Free Essays
This entire site protected by copyright. Copyright © 1998-2006 123Student, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Part of the Free Essay Network.